Employer · WARN Act history · Manufacturing

ATI Alleheny Ludlum

115 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in IN — every mass-layoff and plant-closing filing on record.

115
Workers cut
1
WARN notice
1
State
115
Avg / notice

The verdict

ATI Alleheny Ludlum put 115 workers on WARN notice across 1 filing — the 2,151st-largest WARN footprint of 6,929 tracked employers.

#2,151
of 6,929 employers by workers affected
Top 31%
larger than 69% of tracked employers
1
WARN filing on record
1
state affected, led by IN

Employer Profile

Primary State
IN
Primary Industry
Manufacturing
First Notice
Dec 22, 2008
Latest Notice
Dec 22, 2008
States with Layoffs
IN

WARN Notices by Year: ATI Alleheny Ludlum — Workers affected per year from WARN Act filings

0 workers 0.2 workers 0.4 workers 0.6 workers 0.8 workers 1 workers 2008 0 workers
WARN Notices by Year: ATI Alleheny Ludlum — Workers affected per year from WARN Act filings

Total Workers Affected

115

Across all WARN notices

Number of Notices

1

WARN Act filings on record

Latest Event Date

Dec 2008

Most recent filing

Workforce Impact Severity 30.0%

115 workers across all events

WARN Notice History

2008

Mass Layoff

New Castle, IN · Manufacturing

Effective: Dec 22, 2008

115

workers

Filed Dec 22, 2008

How ATI Alleheny Ludlum compares in Manufacturing

# Employer Workers cutNoticesLead state
1 Boeing 33,263 54 WA
2 Intel 27,000 2 OR
3 Nokia 14,000 1 TX
4 Rivian Automotive 6,700 1 IL
5 Dell Technologies 6,650 1 TX
6 General Motors 4,000 1 MI
7 HP 4,000 1 CA
8 Ford Motor 3,000 1 MI
9 ATI Alleheny Ludlum (this page) 115 1 IN

What this means for IN workers

ATI Alleheny Ludlum has 1 WARN filing on record covering 115 workers, most recently on Dec 22, 2008.

  • If you are affected, file for unemployment and contact your state's rapid-response program inside the WARN Act's 60-day notice window. What to do after a layoff
  • Check whether the required notice pay was provided — the WARN Act can entitle workers to up to 60 days of pay when notice is skipped. Estimate WARN pay
  • See every WARN notice on record in IN, where ATI Alleheny Ludlum's filings were reported. IN layoffs

WARN Act filings only capture layoffs of 50+ workers at sites of 100+ employees, so smaller reductions, contractor non-renewals, and voluntary separations are not shown here.

Reading the ATI Alleheny Ludlum WARN Record

Federal WARN Act filings place ATI Alleheny Ludlum on record with 1 notice covering 115 workers, spanning Dec 22, 2008 through Dec 22, 2008. Because the WARN Act only captures events that affect 50 or more workers at sites of 100+ employees, this count sits at the upper band of the employer's layoff activity — smaller reductions, contractor non-renewals, and voluntary separations are invisible to this dataset. The geographic footprint of 1 state, anchored in IN, in the Manufacturing sector, shapes which state workforce agencies received the filings and which state-level "mini-WARN" thresholds applied.

Averaging 115 workers per notice, ATI Alleheny Ludlum's filings fall into a pattern that is consistent with site-level consolidation or a multi-department reduction in force. This single notice marks a discrete restructuring event rather than a sustained pattern, though workforce changes below the 50-worker WARN floor may have occurred without disclosure.

For workers, the practical layer under these numbers is time: the WARN Act's 60-day notification window triggers eligibility for state unemployment insurance, COBRA health-coverage continuation, and rapid-response services from the state workforce agency that received the filing. Workers on IN-based ATI Alleheny Ludlum notices should contact the IN workforce agency directly — response teams, severance negotiation guidance, and TAA (Trade Adjustment Assistance) screening move fastest in the days immediately following a notice. The record above reflects filed notices only; subsequent hiring, rescinded closures, or facility reopenings are not tracked by WARN disclosures.

Understanding ATI Alleheny Ludlum's Layoff History

ATI Alleheny Ludlum has one WARN Act filing on record. A single notice may reflect an isolated restructuring event, facility closure, or response to changing market conditions.

Each notice has affected an average of 115 workers, representing moderately sized workforce reductions. WARN Act notices only capture layoffs meeting federal thresholds (50+ workers) and may not represent all workforce changes.

Layoff Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ATI Alleheny Ludlum laying off workers?

ATI Alleheny Ludlum has filed 1 WARN Act notice affecting 115 workers across 1 state. The most recent notice was filed on Dec 22, 2008.

How many people has ATI Alleheny Ludlum laid off?

According to WARN Act filings, ATI Alleheny Ludlum has affected 115 workers total, averaging 115 workers per notice.

What states has ATI Alleheny Ludlum had layoffs in?

ATI Alleheny Ludlum has filed WARN notices in 1 state: IN.

What is a WARN Act notice?

The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires employers with 100+ employees to provide 60 days advance notice of plant closings and mass layoffs affecting 50 or more workers. Not all layoffs require WARN notice.

What benefits are available after a ATI Alleheny Ludlum layoff?

Workers affected by a WARN-notified layoff may be eligible for unemployment insurance, COBRA health coverage continuation, job retraining through the Trade Adjustment Assistance program, and severance packages if offered by the employer. State workforce agencies often provide additional rapid response services.

How does ATI Alleheny Ludlum's layoff history compare to the industry?

ATI Alleheny Ludlum has affected 115 workers across 1 WARN filing in the Manufacturing sector. The federal WARN Act only captures layoffs affecting 50 or more workers, so actual workforce changes may be larger.

Data sourced from official state WARN-Act layoff registries. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainLayoffs Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from state WARN Act filings. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.