Employer · WARN Act history · Other Services

Kimberly-Clark

760 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in WA - recorded in the current PlainLayoffs dataset.

760
Workers cut
1
WARN notice
1
State
760
Avg / notice

Kimberly-Clark has 1 recorded WARN filing affecting 760 workers

According to WARN Act filings submitted to state workforce agencies, Kimberly-Clark has 1 recorded filing covering 760 workers across 1 state, primarily WA, the 220th-largest recorded WARN footprint among 7,009 tracked employers. WARN notices cover qualifying reported events, so this record is not a complete count of the employer's workforce changes.

Kimberly-Clark is a minor share of Other Services WARN activity — 0.2% of the sector's 460,348 workers across 3,497 employers, ranking #70 in Other Services.

DOL WARN employer filing desk

Employer KIMBERLY-CLA · Kimberly-Clark 760 workers · 1 filings

NOTC-SINGLE · WORK-HEAVY · PHOTO-UNK · RUNWAY-OVER · STAT-SINGLE · BOOK-SINGLE · TYPE-CLOSE

  • NOTC-SINGLE 1 filing
  • WORK-HEAVY #220
  • PHOTO-UNK No peer
  • RUNWAY-OVER 74d
  • STAT-SINGLE WA
  • BOOK-SINGLE 1 agency
  • TYPE-CLOSE 1 closure

Stamps derive from filed notice_date, effective_date, workers_affected, state agency source, and filing type in this dataset, not a prediction of future layoffs.

Employer Profile

Primary State
WA
Primary Industry
Other Services
First Notice
Oct 19, 2011
Latest Notice
Oct 19, 2011
States with Layoffs
WA

WARN Notice History

2011

Facility Closure

Everett, WA · Other Services

Effective: Jan 1, 2012

760

workers

Filed Oct 19, 2011

Four checks on this Kimberly-Clark filing

What is the largest Kimberly-Clark WARN filing on record?

The largest row is the facility closure filed for Everett, WA on Oct 19, 2011, covering 760 workers in Other Services.

Where were Kimberly-Clark's WARN notices filed?

This is a one-event record from Washington ESD; the named location is Everett, not a company-wide headcount change. States represented in this record: WA.

Does Kimberly-Clark's filing history show a recurring pattern?

One filing cannot establish a recurring layoff cadence. It records a specific WARN-covered event and should not be read as a forecast of this employer's workforce.

How much advance notice appears in Kimberly-Clark's record?

The measurable notice runway clears the federal 60-day baseline; use the dated filing history to see which location and event produced it.

See also: WA WARN filings · Other Services industry WARNs · WARN Act guide

Source: State WARN Act layoff registries Kimberly-Clark notice history aggregated from state workforce agency filings · September 2026 A WARN filing is a required notice, not a judgment of the employer's management or finances. Coverage follows states with structured public registries; this public-record summary is not legal advice, financial advice, or employment advice.

Every figure on PlainLayoffs is rendered directly from public WARN Act filings and state workforce agency records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's notice history is rendered directly from state WARN Act filings. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of September 2026. A WARN filing is a legally required notice, not a judgment of a company's management or financial health; rankings here reflect filed notice volume only.