Employer · WARN Act history · Professional & Technical Services

Prysm

61 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in IN - recorded in the current PlainLayoffs dataset.

61
Workers cut
1
WARN notice
1
State
61
Avg / notice

Prysm has 1 recorded WARN filing affecting 61 workers

According to WARN Act filings submitted to state workforce agencies, Prysm has 1 recorded filing covering 61 workers across 1 state, primarily IN, the 4,080th-largest recorded WARN footprint among 7,009 tracked employers. WARN notices cover qualifying reported events, so this record is not a complete count of the employer's workforce changes.

Prysm is a minor share of Professional & Technical Services WARN activity — 0.3% of the sector's 21,639 workers across 166 employers, ranking #93 in Professional & Technical Services.

DOL WARN employer filing desk

Employer PRYSM · Prysm 61 workers · 1 filings

NOTC-SINGLE · WORK-LIGHT · PHOTO-UNK · RUNWAY-EXACT · STAT-SINGLE · BOOK-SINGLE · TYPE-CLOSE

  • NOTC-SINGLE 1 filing
  • WORK-LIGHT #4,080
  • PHOTO-UNK No peer
  • RUNWAY-EXACT 60d
  • STAT-SINGLE IN
  • BOOK-SINGLE 1 agency
  • TYPE-CLOSE 1 closure

Stamps derive from filed notice_date, effective_date, workers_affected, state agency source, and filing type in this dataset, not a prediction of future layoffs.

Employer Profile

Primary State
IN
Primary Industry
Professional & Technical Services
First Notice
Nov 22, 2017
Latest Notice
Nov 22, 2017
States with Layoffs
IN

WARN Notice History

2017

Facility Closure

Carmel, IN · Professional & Technical Services

Effective: Jan 21, 2018

61

workers

Filed Nov 22, 2017

Four checks on this Prysm filing

What is the largest Prysm WARN filing on record?

The largest row is the facility closure filed for Carmel, IN on Nov 22, 2017, covering 61 workers in Professional & Technical Services.

Where were Prysm's WARN notices filed?

This is a one-event record from Indiana DWD; the named location is Carmel, not a company-wide headcount change. States represented in this record: IN.

Does Prysm's filing history show a recurring pattern?

One filing cannot establish a recurring layoff cadence. It records a specific WARN-covered event and should not be read as a forecast of this employer's workforce.

How much advance notice appears in Prysm's record?

The measurable notice runway lands exactly on the federal 60-day baseline; verify the source dates before treating that timing as final.

See also: IN WARN filings · Professional & Technical Services industry WARNs · WARN Act guide

Source: State WARN Act layoff registries Prysm notice history aggregated from state workforce agency filings · September 2026 A WARN filing is a required notice, not a judgment of the employer's management or finances. Coverage follows states with structured public registries; this public-record summary is not legal advice, financial advice, or employment advice.

Every figure on PlainLayoffs is rendered directly from public WARN Act filings and state workforce agency records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's notice history is rendered directly from state WARN Act filings. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of September 2026. A WARN filing is a legally required notice, not a judgment of a company's management or financial health; rankings here reflect filed notice volume only.