Employer · WARN Act history · Other Services
Tri-County Truss
94 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in WA - recorded in the current PlainLayoffs dataset.
- 94
- Workers cut
- 1
- WARN notice
- 1
- State
- 94
- Avg / notice
Tri-County Truss has 1 recorded WARN filing affecting 94 workers
According to WARN Act filings submitted to state workforce agencies, Tri-County Truss has 1 recorded filing covering 94 workers across 1 state, primarily WA, the 2,741st-largest recorded WARN footprint among 7,009 tracked employers. WARN notices cover qualifying reported events, so this record is not a complete count of the employer's workforce changes.
Tri-County Truss is a minor share of Other Services WARN activity — under 0.1% of the sector's 460,348 workers across 3,497 employers, ranking #1,229 in Other Services.
DOL WARN employer filing desk
Employer TRI-COUNTY-T · Tri-County Truss 94 workers · 1 filings
NOTC-SINGLE · WORK-LIGHT · PHOTO-UNK · RUNWAY-SHORT · STAT-SINGLE · BOOK-SINGLE · TYPE-CLOSE
- NOTC-SINGLE 1 filing
- WORK-LIGHT #2,741
- PHOTO-UNK No peer
- RUNWAY-SHORT 3d
- STAT-SINGLE WA
- BOOK-SINGLE 1 agency
- TYPE-CLOSE 1 closure
Stamps derive from filed notice_date, effective_date, workers_affected, state agency source, and filing type in this dataset, not a prediction of future layoffs.
Employer Profile
Not all layoffs appear in WARN data, see our methodology for the federal + state coverage thresholds. Latest filing: Aug 2011.
WARN Notice History
2011
Burlington, WA · Other Services
Effective: Aug 26, 2011
94
workers
Filed Aug 23, 2011
Four checks on this Tri-County Truss filing
What is the largest Tri-County Truss WARN filing on record? ▼
The largest row is the facility closure filed for Burlington, WA on Aug 23, 2011, covering 94 workers in Other Services.
Where were Tri-County Truss's WARN notices filed? ▼
This is a one-event record from Washington ESD; the named location is Burlington, not a company-wide headcount change. States represented in this record: WA.
Does Tri-County Truss's filing history show a recurring pattern? ▼
One filing cannot establish a recurring layoff cadence. It records a specific WARN-covered event and should not be read as a forecast of this employer's workforce.
How much advance notice appears in Tri-County Truss's record? ▼
The measurable notice runway is under 30 days; compare the filing dates with the federal 60-day baseline before estimating any possible notice-pay shortfall.
See also: WA WARN filings · Other Services industry WARNs · WARN Act guide
Source: State WARN Act layoff registries Tri-County Truss notice history aggregated from state workforce agency filings · September 2026 A WARN filing is a required notice, not a judgment of the employer's management or finances. Coverage follows states with structured public registries; this public-record summary is not legal advice, financial advice, or employment advice.
Every figure on PlainLayoffs is rendered directly from public WARN Act filings and state workforce agency records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's notice history is rendered directly from state WARN Act filings. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of September 2026. A WARN filing is a legally required notice, not a judgment of a company's management or financial health; rankings here reflect filed notice volume only.