Employer · WARN Act history · Information Technology
Palladium-Item
60 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in IN - recorded in the current PlainLayoffs dataset.
- 60
- Workers cut
- 1
- WARN notice
- 1
- State
- 60
- Avg / notice
Palladium-Item has 1 recorded WARN filing affecting 60 workers
According to WARN Act filings submitted to state workforce agencies, Palladium-Item has 1 recorded filing covering 60 workers across 1 state, primarily IN, the 4,139th-largest recorded WARN footprint among 7,009 tracked employers. WARN notices cover qualifying reported events, so this record is not a complete count of the employer's workforce changes.
Palladium-Item is a minor share of Information Technology WARN activity — under 0.1% of the sector's 117,723 workers across 194 employers, ranking #137 in Information Technology.
DOL WARN employer filing desk
Employer PALLADIUM-IT · Palladium-Item 60 workers · 1 filings
NOTC-SINGLE · WORK-LIGHT · PHOTO-UNK · RUNWAY-EXACT · STAT-SINGLE · BOOK-SINGLE · TYPE-LAYOFF
- NOTC-SINGLE 1 filing
- WORK-LIGHT #4,139
- PHOTO-UNK No peer
- RUNWAY-EXACT 60d
- STAT-SINGLE IN
- BOOK-SINGLE 1 agency
- TYPE-LAYOFF 1 layoff
Stamps derive from filed notice_date, effective_date, workers_affected, state agency source, and filing type in this dataset, not a prediction of future layoffs.
Employer Profile
Not all layoffs appear in WARN data, see our methodology for the federal + state coverage thresholds. Latest filing: Nov 2008.
WARN Notice History
2008
Richmond, IN · Information Technology
Effective: Jan 10, 2009
60
workers
Filed Nov 11, 2008
Four checks on this Palladium-Item filing
What is the largest Palladium-Item WARN filing on record? ▼
The largest row is the mass layoff filed for Richmond, IN on Nov 11, 2008, covering 60 workers in Information Technology.
Where were Palladium-Item's WARN notices filed? ▼
This is a one-event record from Indiana DWD; the named location is Richmond, not a company-wide headcount change. States represented in this record: IN.
Does Palladium-Item's filing history show a recurring pattern? ▼
One filing cannot establish a recurring layoff cadence. It records a specific WARN-covered event and should not be read as a forecast of this employer's workforce.
How much advance notice appears in Palladium-Item's record? ▼
The measurable notice runway lands exactly on the federal 60-day baseline; verify the source dates before treating that timing as final.
See also: IN WARN filings · Information Technology industry WARNs · WARN Act guide
Source: State WARN Act layoff registries Palladium-Item notice history aggregated from state workforce agency filings · September 2026 A WARN filing is a required notice, not a judgment of the employer's management or finances. Coverage follows states with structured public registries; this public-record summary is not legal advice, financial advice, or employment advice.
Every figure on PlainLayoffs is rendered directly from public WARN Act filings and state workforce agency records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's notice history is rendered directly from state WARN Act filings. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of September 2026. A WARN filing is a legally required notice, not a judgment of a company's management or financial health; rankings here reflect filed notice volume only.