Employer · WARN Act history · Information Technology
PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific
69 workers across 1 WARN notice, primarily in WI - recorded in the current PlainLayoffs dataset.
- 69
- Workers cut
- 1
- WARN notice
- 1
- State
- 69
- Avg / notice
PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific has 1 recorded WARN filing affecting 69 workers
According to WARN Act filings submitted to state workforce agencies, PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific has 1 recorded filing covering 69 workers across 1 state, primarily WI, the 3,712th-largest recorded WARN footprint among 7,009 tracked employers. WARN notices cover qualifying reported events, so this record is not a complete count of the employer's workforce changes.
PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific is a minor share of Information Technology WARN activity — under 0.1% of the sector's 117,723 workers across 194 employers, ranking #121 in Information Technology.
DOL WARN employer filing desk
Employer PPD-D-B-A-TH · PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific 69 workers · 1 filings
NOTC-SINGLE · WORK-LIGHT · PHOTO-UNK · RUNWAY-OVER · STAT-SINGLE · BOOK-SINGLE · TYPE-LAYOFF
- NOTC-SINGLE 1 filing
- WORK-LIGHT #3,712
- PHOTO-UNK No peer
- RUNWAY-OVER 82d
- STAT-SINGLE WI
- BOOK-SINGLE 1 agency
- TYPE-LAYOFF 1 layoff
Stamps derive from filed notice_date, effective_date, workers_affected, state agency source, and filing type in this dataset, not a prediction of future layoffs.
Employer Profile
Not all layoffs appear in WARN data, see our methodology for the federal + state coverage thresholds. Latest filing: Jul 2026.
WARN Notice History
2026
Middleton, WI · Information Technology
Effective: Sep 28, 2026
69
workers
Filed Jul 8, 2026
Four checks on this PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filing
What is the largest PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific WARN filing on record? ▼
The largest row is the mass layoff filed for Middleton, WI on Jul 8, 2026, covering 69 workers in Information Technology.
Where were PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific's WARN notices filed? ▼
This is a one-event record from Wisconsin DWD; the named location is Middleton, not a company-wide headcount change. States represented in this record: WI.
Does PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific's filing history show a recurring pattern? ▼
One filing cannot establish a recurring layoff cadence. It records a specific WARN-covered event and should not be read as a forecast of this employer's workforce.
How much advance notice appears in PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific's record? ▼
The measurable notice runway clears the federal 60-day baseline; use the dated filing history to see which location and event produced it.
See also: WI WARN filings · Information Technology industry WARNs · WARN Act guide
Source: State WARN Act layoff registries PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific notice history aggregated from state workforce agency filings · September 2026 A WARN filing is a required notice, not a judgment of the employer's management or finances. Coverage follows states with structured public registries; this public-record summary is not legal advice, financial advice, or employment advice.
Every figure on PlainLayoffs is rendered directly from public WARN Act filings and state workforce agency records, no number is typed in by an editor. This employer's notice history is rendered directly from state WARN Act filings. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of September 2026. A WARN filing is a legally required notice, not a judgment of a company's management or financial health; rankings here reflect filed notice volume only.